Hands-On Exercise 9: Calibrating Hedonic Pricing Model for Private Highrise Property with GWR Method

Hands-On
Code
Author

Kwee Cheng

Published

October 27, 2024

Modified

October 27, 2024

pacman::p_load(olsrr, corrplot, ggpubr, sf, spdep, GWmodel, tmap, tidyverse, gtsummary)

The GWmodel package offers a suite of localized spatial statistical methods, including geographically weighted (GW) summary statistics, principal components analysis, discriminant analysis, and various forms of regression, with both standard and robust (outlier-resistant) options. These outputs are often mapped, serving as a valuable exploratory tool that can guide subsequent, more advanced statistical analyses.

Geospatial Data Wrangling

mpsz = st_read(dsn = "data/geospatial", layer = "MP14_SUBZONE_WEB_PL")
Reading layer `MP14_SUBZONE_WEB_PL' from data source 
  `C:\IS415\Hands-on_Ex\Hands-on_Ex09\data\geospatial' using driver `ESRI Shapefile'
Simple feature collection with 323 features and 15 fields
Geometry type: MULTIPOLYGON
Dimension:     XY
Bounding box:  xmin: 2667.538 ymin: 15748.72 xmax: 56396.44 ymax: 50256.33
Projected CRS: SVY21

Updating CRS information

mpsz_svy21 <- st_transform(mpsz, 3414)
st_crs(mpsz_svy21)
Coordinate Reference System:
  User input: EPSG:3414 
  wkt:
PROJCRS["SVY21 / Singapore TM",
    BASEGEOGCRS["SVY21",
        DATUM["SVY21",
            ELLIPSOID["WGS 84",6378137,298.257223563,
                LENGTHUNIT["metre",1]]],
        PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,
            ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433]],
        ID["EPSG",4757]],
    CONVERSION["Singapore Transverse Mercator",
        METHOD["Transverse Mercator",
            ID["EPSG",9807]],
        PARAMETER["Latitude of natural origin",1.36666666666667,
            ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433],
            ID["EPSG",8801]],
        PARAMETER["Longitude of natural origin",103.833333333333,
            ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433],
            ID["EPSG",8802]],
        PARAMETER["Scale factor at natural origin",1,
            SCALEUNIT["unity",1],
            ID["EPSG",8805]],
        PARAMETER["False easting",28001.642,
            LENGTHUNIT["metre",1],
            ID["EPSG",8806]],
        PARAMETER["False northing",38744.572,
            LENGTHUNIT["metre",1],
            ID["EPSG",8807]]],
    CS[Cartesian,2],
        AXIS["northing (N)",north,
            ORDER[1],
            LENGTHUNIT["metre",1]],
        AXIS["easting (E)",east,
            ORDER[2],
            LENGTHUNIT["metre",1]],
    USAGE[
        SCOPE["Cadastre, engineering survey, topographic mapping."],
        AREA["Singapore - onshore and offshore."],
        BBOX[1.13,103.59,1.47,104.07]],
    ID["EPSG",3414]]

reveal the extent of mpsz_svy21 by using st_bbox() of sf package

st_bbox(mpsz_svy21)
     xmin      ymin      xmax      ymax 
 2667.538 15748.721 56396.440 50256.334

Aspatial Data Wrangling

condo_resale = read_csv("data/aspatial/Condo_resale_2015.csv")
Rows: 1436 Columns: 23
── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Delimiter: ","
dbl (23): LATITUDE, LONGITUDE, POSTCODE, SELLING_PRICE, AREA_SQM, AGE, PROX_...

ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.

After importing the data file into R, it is important for us to examine if the data file has been imported correctly.

glimpse() to display the data structure 

glimpse(condo_resale)
Rows: 1,436
Columns: 23
$ LATITUDE             <dbl> 1.287145, 1.328698, 1.313727, 1.308563, 1.321437,…
$ LONGITUDE            <dbl> 103.7802, 103.8123, 103.7971, 103.8247, 103.9505,…
$ POSTCODE             <dbl> 118635, 288420, 267833, 258380, 467169, 466472, 3…
$ SELLING_PRICE        <dbl> 3000000, 3880000, 3325000, 4250000, 1400000, 1320…
$ AREA_SQM             <dbl> 309, 290, 248, 127, 145, 139, 218, 141, 165, 168,…
$ AGE                  <dbl> 30, 32, 33, 7, 28, 22, 24, 24, 27, 31, 17, 22, 6,…
$ PROX_CBD             <dbl> 7.941259, 6.609797, 6.898000, 4.038861, 11.783402…
$ PROX_CHILDCARE       <dbl> 0.16597932, 0.28027246, 0.42922669, 0.39473543, 0…
$ PROX_ELDERLYCARE     <dbl> 2.5198118, 1.9333338, 0.5021395, 1.9910316, 1.121…
$ PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA <dbl> 6.618741, 7.505109, 6.463887, 4.906512, 6.410632,…
$ PROX_HAWKER_MARKET   <dbl> 1.76542207, 0.54507614, 0.37789301, 1.68259969, 0…
$ PROX_KINDERGARTEN    <dbl> 0.05835552, 0.61592412, 0.14120309, 0.38200076, 0…
$ PROX_MRT             <dbl> 0.5607188, 0.6584461, 0.3053433, 0.6910183, 0.528…
$ PROX_PARK            <dbl> 1.1710446, 0.1992269, 0.2779886, 0.9832843, 0.116…
$ PROX_PRIMARY_SCH     <dbl> 1.6340256, 0.9747834, 1.4715016, 1.4546324, 0.709…
$ PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH <dbl> 3.3273195, 0.9747834, 1.4715016, 2.3006394, 0.709…
$ PROX_SHOPPING_MALL   <dbl> 2.2102717, 2.9374279, 1.2256850, 0.3525671, 1.307…
$ PROX_SUPERMARKET     <dbl> 0.9103958, 0.5900617, 0.4135583, 0.4162219, 0.581…
$ PROX_BUS_STOP        <dbl> 0.10336166, 0.28673408, 0.28504777, 0.29872340, 0…
$ NO_Of_UNITS          <dbl> 18, 20, 27, 30, 30, 31, 32, 32, 32, 32, 34, 34, 3…
$ FAMILY_FRIENDLY      <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0…
$ FREEHOLD             <dbl> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1…
$ LEASEHOLD_99YR       <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0…
head(condo_resale$LONGITUDE) #see the data in XCOORD column
[1] 103.7802 103.8123 103.7971 103.8247 103.9505 103.9386
head(condo_resale$LATITUDE) #see the data in YCOORD column
[1] 1.287145 1.328698 1.313727 1.308563 1.321437 1.314198

summary() of base R is used to display the summary statistics of cond_resale tibble data frame

summary(condo_resale)
    LATITUDE       LONGITUDE        POSTCODE      SELLING_PRICE     
 Min.   :1.240   Min.   :103.7   Min.   : 18965   Min.   :  540000  
 1st Qu.:1.309   1st Qu.:103.8   1st Qu.:259849   1st Qu.: 1100000  
 Median :1.328   Median :103.8   Median :469298   Median : 1383222  
 Mean   :1.334   Mean   :103.8   Mean   :440439   Mean   : 1751211  
 3rd Qu.:1.357   3rd Qu.:103.9   3rd Qu.:589486   3rd Qu.: 1950000  
 Max.   :1.454   Max.   :104.0   Max.   :828833   Max.   :18000000  
    AREA_SQM          AGE           PROX_CBD       PROX_CHILDCARE    
 Min.   : 34.0   Min.   : 0.00   Min.   : 0.3869   Min.   :0.004927  
 1st Qu.:103.0   1st Qu.: 5.00   1st Qu.: 5.5574   1st Qu.:0.174481  
 Median :121.0   Median :11.00   Median : 9.3567   Median :0.258135  
 Mean   :136.5   Mean   :12.14   Mean   : 9.3254   Mean   :0.326313  
 3rd Qu.:156.0   3rd Qu.:18.00   3rd Qu.:12.6661   3rd Qu.:0.368293  
 Max.   :619.0   Max.   :37.00   Max.   :19.1804   Max.   :3.465726  
 PROX_ELDERLYCARE  PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA PROX_HAWKER_MARKET PROX_KINDERGARTEN 
 Min.   :0.05451   Min.   :0.2145       Min.   :0.05182    Min.   :0.004927  
 1st Qu.:0.61254   1st Qu.:3.1643       1st Qu.:0.55245    1st Qu.:0.276345  
 Median :0.94179   Median :4.6186       Median :0.90842    Median :0.413385  
 Mean   :1.05351   Mean   :4.5981       Mean   :1.27987    Mean   :0.458903  
 3rd Qu.:1.35122   3rd Qu.:5.7550       3rd Qu.:1.68578    3rd Qu.:0.578474  
 Max.   :3.94916   Max.   :9.1554       Max.   :5.37435    Max.   :2.229045  
    PROX_MRT         PROX_PARK       PROX_PRIMARY_SCH  PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH
 Min.   :0.05278   Min.   :0.02906   Min.   :0.07711   Min.   :0.07711     
 1st Qu.:0.34646   1st Qu.:0.26211   1st Qu.:0.44024   1st Qu.:1.34451     
 Median :0.57430   Median :0.39926   Median :0.63505   Median :1.88213     
 Mean   :0.67316   Mean   :0.49802   Mean   :0.75471   Mean   :2.27347     
 3rd Qu.:0.84844   3rd Qu.:0.65592   3rd Qu.:0.95104   3rd Qu.:2.90954     
 Max.   :3.48037   Max.   :2.16105   Max.   :3.92899   Max.   :6.74819     
 PROX_SHOPPING_MALL PROX_SUPERMARKET PROX_BUS_STOP       NO_Of_UNITS    
 Min.   :0.0000     Min.   :0.0000   Min.   :0.001595   Min.   :  18.0  
 1st Qu.:0.5258     1st Qu.:0.3695   1st Qu.:0.098356   1st Qu.: 188.8  
 Median :0.9357     Median :0.5687   Median :0.151710   Median : 360.0  
 Mean   :1.0455     Mean   :0.6141   Mean   :0.193974   Mean   : 409.2  
 3rd Qu.:1.3994     3rd Qu.:0.7862   3rd Qu.:0.220466   3rd Qu.: 590.0  
 Max.   :3.4774     Max.   :2.2441   Max.   :2.476639   Max.   :1703.0  
 FAMILY_FRIENDLY     FREEHOLD      LEASEHOLD_99YR  
 Min.   :0.0000   Min.   :0.0000   Min.   :0.0000  
 1st Qu.:0.0000   1st Qu.:0.0000   1st Qu.:0.0000  
 Median :0.0000   Median :0.0000   Median :0.0000  
 Mean   :0.4868   Mean   :0.4227   Mean   :0.4882  
 3rd Qu.:1.0000   3rd Qu.:1.0000   3rd Qu.:1.0000  
 Max.   :1.0000   Max.   :1.0000   Max.   :1.0000

Converting aspatial data frame into a sf object

The condo_resale tibble data frame is currently aspatial, and the goal is to convert it into a spatial (sf) object. The code chunk below accomplishes this by using the st_as_sf() function from the sf package to create a simple feature data frame.

condo_resale.sf <- st_as_sf(condo_resale,
                            coords = c("LONGITUDE", "LATITUDE"),
                            crs=4326) %>%
  st_transform(crs=3414)

st_transform() of sf package is used to convert the coordinates from wgs84 (i.e. crs:4326) to svy21 (i.e. crs=3414).

head(condo_resale.sf)
Simple feature collection with 6 features and 21 fields
Geometry type: POINT
Dimension:     XY
Bounding box:  xmin: 22085.12 ymin: 29951.54 xmax: 41042.56 ymax: 34546.2
Projected CRS: SVY21 / Singapore TM
# A tibble: 6 × 22
  POSTCODE SELLING_PRICE AREA_SQM   AGE PROX_CBD PROX_CHILDCARE PROX_ELDERLYCARE
     <dbl>         <dbl>    <dbl> <dbl>    <dbl>          <dbl>            <dbl>
1   118635       3000000      309    30     7.94          0.166            2.52 
2   288420       3880000      290    32     6.61          0.280            1.93 
3   267833       3325000      248    33     6.90          0.429            0.502
4   258380       4250000      127     7     4.04          0.395            1.99 
5   467169       1400000      145    28    11.8           0.119            1.12 
6   466472       1320000      139    22    10.3           0.125            0.789
# ℹ 15 more variables: PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA <dbl>, PROX_HAWKER_MARKET <dbl>,
#   PROX_KINDERGARTEN <dbl>, PROX_MRT <dbl>, PROX_PARK <dbl>,
#   PROX_PRIMARY_SCH <dbl>, PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH <dbl>,
#   PROX_SHOPPING_MALL <dbl>, PROX_SUPERMARKET <dbl>, PROX_BUS_STOP <dbl>,
#   NO_Of_UNITS <dbl>, FAMILY_FRIENDLY <dbl>, FREEHOLD <dbl>,
#   LEASEHOLD_99YR <dbl>, geometry <POINT [m]>

Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA)

EDA using statistical graphics

We can plot the distribution of SELLING_PRICE by using appropriate Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) 

ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x=`SELLING_PRICE`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

The figure indicates a right-skewed distribution, suggesting that most condominium units were transacted at relatively lower prices. Statistically, this skew can be normalized using a log transformation. The code chunk below applies a log transformation to the SELLING_PRICE variable, creating a new variable called LOG_SELLING_PRICE using the mutate() function from the dplyr package.

condo_resale.sf <- condo_resale.sf %>%
  mutate(`LOG_SELLING_PRICE` = log(SELLING_PRICE))
ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x=`LOG_SELLING_PRICE`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

Multiple Histogram Plots distribution of variables

In this section, you will learn how to draw a small multiple histograms (also known as trellis plot) by using ggarrange() of ggpubr package.

The code chunk below is used to create 12 histograms. Then, ggarrange() is used to organised these histogram into a 3 columns by 4 rows small multiple plot.

AREA_SQM <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `AREA_SQM`)) + 
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

AGE <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `AGE`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_CBD <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_CBD`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_CHILDCARE <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_CHILDCARE`)) + 
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_ELDERLYCARE <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_ELDERLYCARE`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, 
                               aes(x= `PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_HAWKER_MARKET <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_HAWKER_MARKET`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_KINDERGARTEN <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_KINDERGARTEN`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_MRT <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_MRT`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_PARK <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_PARK`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_PRIMARY_SCH <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, aes(x= `PROX_PRIMARY_SCH`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH <- ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf, 
                               aes(x= `PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH`)) +
  geom_histogram(bins=20, color="black", fill="light blue")

ggarrange(AREA_SQM, AGE, PROX_CBD, PROX_CHILDCARE, PROX_ELDERLYCARE, 
          PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA, PROX_HAWKER_MARKET, PROX_KINDERGARTEN, PROX_MRT,
          PROX_PARK, PROX_PRIMARY_SCH, PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH,  
          ncol = 3, nrow = 4)

Drawing Statistical Point Map

Lastly, we want to reveal the geospatial distribution condominium resale prices in Singapore. The map will be prepared by using tmap package.

tmap_mode("view")
tmap mode set to interactive viewing
tmap_options(check.and.fix = TRUE)
tm_shape(mpsz_svy21)+
  tm_polygons() +
tm_shape(condo_resale.sf) +  
  tm_dots(col = "SELLING_PRICE",
          alpha = 0.6,
          style="quantile") +
  tm_view(set.zoom.limits = c(11,14))
Warning: The shape mpsz_svy21 is invalid (after reprojection). See
sf::st_is_valid

set.zoom.limits argument of tm_view() sets the minimum and maximum zoom level to 11 and 14 respectively.

tmap_mode("plot")
tmap mode set to plotting

Hedonic Pricing Modelling in R

In this section, you will learn how to building hedonic pricing models for condominium resale units using lm() of R base.

Simple Linear Regression Method

First, we will build a simple linear regression model by using SELLING_PRICE as the dependent variable and AREA_SQM as the independent variable.

condo.slr <- lm(formula=SELLING_PRICE ~ AREA_SQM, data = condo_resale.sf)

The lm() function returns an object of class “lm” for single responses or class c("mlm", "lm") for multiple responses. The summary() and anova() functions provide summaries and analysis of variance tables for lm results. Generic accessor functions like coefficients, effects, fitted.values, and residuals extract specific components from the lm output.

summary(condo.slr)

Call:
lm(formula = SELLING_PRICE ~ AREA_SQM, data = condo_resale.sf)

Residuals:
     Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max 
-3695815  -391764   -87517   258900 13503875 

Coefficients:
             Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
(Intercept) -258121.1    63517.2  -4.064 5.09e-05 ***
AREA_SQM      14719.0      428.1  34.381  < 2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

Residual standard error: 942700 on 1434 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared:  0.4518,    Adjusted R-squared:  0.4515 
F-statistic:  1182 on 1 and 1434 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16

The output report indicates that SELLING_PRICE can be modeled by the formula:

y=−258121.1+14719x1y = -258121.1 + 14719x_1y=−258121.1+14719x1​

The R-squared value of 0.4518 suggests that this simple regression model explains approximately 45% of the variance in resale prices. Given that the p-value is much smaller than 0.0001, we reject the null hypothesis, concluding that the mean is not a good estimator for SELLING_PRICE and that this simple linear regression model is a strong estimator instead.

In the Coefficients section, both the intercept and the ARA_SQM estimate have p-values smaller than 0.001. Thus, we reject the null hypothesis that the coefficients B0B_0B0​ and B1B_1B1​ are equal to zero, implying that they are significant parameter estimates.

To visualize this best-fit line, the lm() function can be incorporated as a method in ggplot to display the regression line on a scatterplot, as shown in the following code chunk.

ggplot(data=condo_resale.sf,  
       aes(x=`AREA_SQM`, y=`SELLING_PRICE`)) +
  geom_point() +
  geom_smooth(method = lm)
`geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ x'

Multiple Linear Regression Method

Visualising the relationships of the independent variables

Before constructing a multiple regression model, it is essential to confirm that the independent variables are not highly correlated, as high correlations can lead to multicollinearity, which degrades model quality.

A correlation matrix is a common tool to visualize the relationships among independent variables. While the pairs() function in R can display this, various packages also offer enhanced visualization options. In this case, the corrplot package is used.

The code chunk below generates a scatterplot matrix to visualize the relationships between the independent variables in the condo_resale data frame.

corrplot(cor(condo_resale[, 5:23]), diag = FALSE, order = "AOE",
         tl.pos = "td", tl.cex = 0.5, method = "number", type = "upper")

Matrix reordering is crucial for uncovering hidden structures and patterns within a correlation matrix. The corrplot package offers four ordering methods through the order parameter: “AOE,” “FPC,” “hclust,” and “alphabet.” In the code chunk above, “AOE” (Angular Order of the Eigenvectors) is used, following Michael Friendly’s method.

The scatterplot matrix reveals a high correlation between Freehold and LEASE_99YEAR. To improve model robustness, only one of these variables should be included in the regression model, so LEASE_99YEAR is excluded from the subsequent modeling process.

Building a hedonic pricing model using multiple linear regression method

lm() to calibrate the multiple linear regression model

condo.mlr <- lm(formula = SELLING_PRICE ~ AREA_SQM + AGE    + 
                  PROX_CBD + PROX_CHILDCARE + PROX_ELDERLYCARE +
                  PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA + PROX_HAWKER_MARKET + PROX_KINDERGARTEN + 
                  PROX_MRT  + PROX_PARK + PROX_PRIMARY_SCH + 
                  PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH + PROX_SHOPPING_MALL + PROX_SUPERMARKET + 
                  PROX_BUS_STOP + NO_Of_UNITS + FAMILY_FRIENDLY + FREEHOLD, 
                data=condo_resale.sf)
summary(condo.mlr)

Call:
lm(formula = SELLING_PRICE ~ AREA_SQM + AGE + PROX_CBD + PROX_CHILDCARE + 
    PROX_ELDERLYCARE + PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA + PROX_HAWKER_MARKET + 
    PROX_KINDERGARTEN + PROX_MRT + PROX_PARK + PROX_PRIMARY_SCH + 
    PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH + PROX_SHOPPING_MALL + PROX_SUPERMARKET + 
    PROX_BUS_STOP + NO_Of_UNITS + FAMILY_FRIENDLY + FREEHOLD, 
    data = condo_resale.sf)

Residuals:
     Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max 
-3475964  -293923   -23069   241043 12260381 

Coefficients:
                       Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
(Intercept)           481728.40  121441.01   3.967 7.65e-05 ***
AREA_SQM               12708.32     369.59  34.385  < 2e-16 ***
AGE                   -24440.82    2763.16  -8.845  < 2e-16 ***
PROX_CBD              -78669.78    6768.97 -11.622  < 2e-16 ***
PROX_CHILDCARE       -351617.91  109467.25  -3.212  0.00135 ** 
PROX_ELDERLYCARE      171029.42   42110.51   4.061 5.14e-05 ***
PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA   38474.53   12523.57   3.072  0.00217 ** 
PROX_HAWKER_MARKET     23746.10   29299.76   0.810  0.41782    
PROX_KINDERGARTEN     147468.99   82668.87   1.784  0.07466 .  
PROX_MRT             -314599.68   57947.44  -5.429 6.66e-08 ***
PROX_PARK             563280.50   66551.68   8.464  < 2e-16 ***
PROX_PRIMARY_SCH      180186.08   65237.95   2.762  0.00582 ** 
PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH    2280.04   20410.43   0.112  0.91107    
PROX_SHOPPING_MALL   -206604.06   42840.60  -4.823 1.57e-06 ***
PROX_SUPERMARKET      -44991.80   77082.64  -0.584  0.55953    
PROX_BUS_STOP         683121.35  138353.28   4.938 8.85e-07 ***
NO_Of_UNITS             -231.18      89.03  -2.597  0.00951 ** 
FAMILY_FRIENDLY       140340.77   47020.55   2.985  0.00289 ** 
FREEHOLD              359913.01   49220.22   7.312 4.38e-13 ***
---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

Residual standard error: 755800 on 1417 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared:  0.6518,    Adjusted R-squared:  0.6474 
F-statistic: 147.4 on 18 and 1417 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16

Preparing Publication Quality Table: olsrr method

Based on the report above, it is evident that not all independent variables are statistically significant. The model will be revised by removing the non-significant variables to improve accuracy.

The code chunk below is ready to calibrate this revised model.

condo.mlr1 <- lm(formula = SELLING_PRICE ~ AREA_SQM + AGE + 
                   PROX_CBD + PROX_CHILDCARE + PROX_ELDERLYCARE +
                   PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA + PROX_MRT  + PROX_PARK + 
                   PROX_PRIMARY_SCH + PROX_SHOPPING_MALL    + PROX_BUS_STOP + 
                   NO_Of_UNITS + FAMILY_FRIENDLY + FREEHOLD,
                 data=condo_resale.sf)
ols_regress(condo.mlr1)
                                Model Summary                                 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                            0.807       RMSE                     751998.679 
R-Squared                    0.651       MSE                571471422208.591 
Adj. R-Squared               0.647       Coef. Var                    43.168 
Pred R-Squared               0.638       AIC                       42966.758 
MAE                     414819.628       SBC                       43051.072 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 RMSE: Root Mean Square Error 
 MSE: Mean Square Error 
 MAE: Mean Absolute Error 
 AIC: Akaike Information Criteria 
 SBC: Schwarz Bayesian Criteria 

                                     ANOVA                                       
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Sum of                                                      
                   Squares          DF         Mean Square       F         Sig. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regression    1.512586e+15          14        1.080418e+14    189.059    0.0000 
Residual      8.120609e+14        1421    571471422208.591                      
Total         2.324647e+15        1435                                          
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                               Parameter Estimates                                                
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               model           Beta    Std. Error    Std. Beta       t        Sig           lower          upper 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Intercept)     527633.222    108183.223                   4.877    0.000     315417.244     739849.200 
            AREA_SQM      12777.523       367.479        0.584     34.771    0.000      12056.663      13498.382 
                 AGE     -24687.739      2754.845       -0.167     -8.962    0.000     -30091.739     -19283.740 
            PROX_CBD     -77131.323      5763.125       -0.263    -13.384    0.000     -88436.469     -65826.176 
      PROX_CHILDCARE    -318472.751    107959.512       -0.084     -2.950    0.003    -530249.889    -106695.613 
    PROX_ELDERLYCARE     185575.623     39901.864        0.090      4.651    0.000     107302.737     263848.510 
PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA      39163.254     11754.829        0.060      3.332    0.001      16104.571      62221.936 
            PROX_MRT    -294745.107     56916.367       -0.112     -5.179    0.000    -406394.234    -183095.980 
           PROX_PARK     570504.807     65507.029        0.150      8.709    0.000     442003.938     699005.677 
    PROX_PRIMARY_SCH     159856.136     60234.599        0.062      2.654    0.008      41697.849     278014.424 
  PROX_SHOPPING_MALL    -220947.251     36561.832       -0.115     -6.043    0.000    -292668.213    -149226.288 
       PROX_BUS_STOP     682482.221    134513.243        0.134      5.074    0.000     418616.359     946348.082 
         NO_Of_UNITS       -245.480        87.947       -0.053     -2.791    0.005       -418.000        -72.961 
     FAMILY_FRIENDLY     146307.576     46893.021        0.057      3.120    0.002      54320.593     238294.560 
            FREEHOLD     350599.812     48506.485        0.136      7.228    0.000     255447.802     445751.821 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preparing Publication Quality Table: gtsummary method

The gtsummary package provides an elegant and flexible way to create publication-ready summary tables in R.

In the code chunk below, tbl_regression() is used to create a well formatted regression report.

tbl_regression(condo.mlr1, intercept = TRUE)
Characteristic Beta 95% CI1 p-value
(Intercept) 527,633 315,417, 739,849 <0.001
AREA_SQM 12,778 12,057, 13,498 <0.001
AGE -24,688 -30,092, -19,284 <0.001
PROX_CBD -77,131 -88,436, -65,826 <0.001
PROX_CHILDCARE -318,473 -530,250, -106,696 0.003
PROX_ELDERLYCARE 185,576 107,303, 263,849 <0.001
PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA 39,163 16,105, 62,222 <0.001
PROX_MRT -294,745 -406,394, -183,096 <0.001
PROX_PARK 570,505 442,004, 699,006 <0.001
PROX_PRIMARY_SCH 159,856 41,698, 278,014 0.008
PROX_SHOPPING_MALL -220,947 -292,668, -149,226 <0.001
PROX_BUS_STOP 682,482 418,616, 946,348 <0.001
NO_Of_UNITS -245 -418, -73 0.005
FAMILY_FRIENDLY 146,308 54,321, 238,295 0.002
FREEHOLD 350,600 255,448, 445,752 <0.001
1 CI = Confidence Interval

The gtsummary package allows you to include model statistics in the report. You can either append them directly to the report table using add_glance_table() or add them as a table source note using add_glance_source_note(), as demonstrated in the code chunk below.

tbl_regression(condo.mlr1, 
               intercept = TRUE) %>% 
  add_glance_source_note(
    label = list(sigma ~ "\U03C3"),
    include = c(r.squared, adj.r.squared, 
                AIC, statistic,
                p.value, sigma))
Characteristic Beta 95% CI1 p-value
(Intercept) 527,633 315,417, 739,849 <0.001
AREA_SQM 12,778 12,057, 13,498 <0.001
AGE -24,688 -30,092, -19,284 <0.001
PROX_CBD -77,131 -88,436, -65,826 <0.001
PROX_CHILDCARE -318,473 -530,250, -106,696 0.003
PROX_ELDERLYCARE 185,576 107,303, 263,849 <0.001
PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA 39,163 16,105, 62,222 <0.001
PROX_MRT -294,745 -406,394, -183,096 <0.001
PROX_PARK 570,505 442,004, 699,006 <0.001
PROX_PRIMARY_SCH 159,856 41,698, 278,014 0.008
PROX_SHOPPING_MALL -220,947 -292,668, -149,226 <0.001
PROX_BUS_STOP 682,482 418,616, 946,348 <0.001
NO_Of_UNITS -245 -418, -73 0.005
FAMILY_FRIENDLY 146,308 54,321, 238,295 0.002
FREEHOLD 350,600 255,448, 445,752 <0.001
R² = 0.651; Adjusted R² = 0.647; AIC = 42,967; Statistic = 189; p-value = <0.001; σ = 755,957
1 CI = Confidence Interval

Checking for multicolinearity

In this section, we would like to introduce you a fantastic R package specially programmed for performing OLS regression. It is called olsrr. It provides a collection of very useful methods for building better multiple linear regression models:

  • comprehensive regression output

  • residual diagnostics

  • measures of influence

  • heteroskedasticity tests

  • collinearity diagnostics

  • model fit assessment

  • variable contribution assessment

  • variable selection procedures

In the code chunk below, the ols_vif_tol() of olsrr package is used to test if there are sign of multicollinearity.

ols_vif_tol(condo.mlr1)
              Variables Tolerance      VIF
1              AREA_SQM 0.8728554 1.145665
2                   AGE 0.7071275 1.414172
3              PROX_CBD 0.6356147 1.573280
4        PROX_CHILDCARE 0.3066019 3.261559
5      PROX_ELDERLYCARE 0.6598479 1.515501
6  PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA 0.7510311 1.331503
7              PROX_MRT 0.5236090 1.909822
8             PROX_PARK 0.8279261 1.207837
9      PROX_PRIMARY_SCH 0.4524628 2.210126
10   PROX_SHOPPING_MALL 0.6738795 1.483945
11        PROX_BUS_STOP 0.3514118 2.845664
12          NO_Of_UNITS 0.6901036 1.449058
13      FAMILY_FRIENDLY 0.7244157 1.380423
14             FREEHOLD 0.6931163 1.442759

Test for Non-Linearity

In multiple linear regression, it is important for us to test the assumption that linearity and additivity of the relationship between dependent and independent variables.

In the code chunk below, the ols_plot_resid_fit() of olsrr package is used to perform linearity assumption test.

ols_plot_resid_fit(condo.mlr1)

The figure above reveals that most of the data poitns are scattered around the 0 line, hence we can safely conclude that the relationships between the dependent variable and independent variables are linear.

Test for Normality Assumption

Lastly, the code chunk below uses ols_plot_resid_hist() of olsrr package to perform normality assumption test.

ols_plot_resid_hist(condo.mlr1)

The figure reveals that the residual of the multiple linear regression model (i.e. condo.mlr1) is resemble normal distribution.

If you prefer formal statistical test methods, the ols_test_normality() of olsrr package can be used as shown in the code chun below.

ols_test_normality(condo.mlr1)
Warning in ks.test.default(y, "pnorm", mean(y), sd(y)): ties should not be
present for the one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
-----------------------------------------------
       Test             Statistic       pvalue  
-----------------------------------------------
Shapiro-Wilk              0.6856         0.0000 
Kolmogorov-Smirnov        0.1366         0.0000 
Cramer-von Mises         121.0768        0.0000 
Anderson-Darling         67.9551         0.0000 
-----------------------------------------------

The summary table above reveals that the p-values of the four tests are way smaller than the alpha value of 0.05. Hence we will reject the null hypothesis and infer that there is statistical evidence that the residual are not normally distributed.

Testing for Spatial Autocorrelation

The hedonic model we try to build are using geographically referenced attributes, hence it is also important for us to visual the residual of the hedonic pricing model.

In order to perform spatial autocorrelation test, we need to convert condo_resale.sf from sf data frame into a SpatialPointsDataFrame.

First, we will export the residual of the hedonic pricing model and save it as a data frame

mlr.output <- as.data.frame(condo.mlr1$residuals)

Next, we will join the newly created data frame with condo_resale.sf object.

condo_resale.res.sf <- cbind(condo_resale.sf, 
                        condo.mlr1$residuals) %>%
rename(`MLR_RES` = `condo.mlr1.residuals`)

Next, we will convert condo_resale.res.sf from simple feature object into a SpatialPointsDataFrame because spdep package can only process sp conformed spatial data objects.

The code chunk below will be used to perform the data conversion process.

condo_resale.sp <- as_Spatial(condo_resale.res.sf)
condo_resale.sp
class       : SpatialPointsDataFrame 
features    : 1436 
extent      : 14940.85, 43352.45, 24765.67, 48382.81  (xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax)
crs         : +proj=tmerc +lat_0=1.36666666666667 +lon_0=103.833333333333 +k=1 +x_0=28001.642 +y_0=38744.572 +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs 
variables   : 23
names       : POSTCODE, SELLING_PRICE, AREA_SQM, AGE,    PROX_CBD, PROX_CHILDCARE, PROX_ELDERLYCARE, PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA, PROX_HAWKER_MARKET, PROX_KINDERGARTEN,    PROX_MRT,   PROX_PARK, PROX_PRIMARY_SCH, PROX_TOP_PRIMARY_SCH, PROX_SHOPPING_MALL, ... 
min values  :    18965,        540000,       34,   0, 0.386916393,    0.004927023,      0.054508623,          0.214539508,        0.051817113,       0.004927023, 0.052779424, 0.029064164,      0.077106132,          0.077106132,                  0, ... 
max values  :   828833,       1.8e+07,      619,  37, 19.18042832,     3.46572633,      3.949157205,           9.15540001,        5.374348075,       2.229045366,  3.48037319,  2.16104919,      3.928989144,          6.748192062,        3.477433767, ...

Next, we will use tmap package to display the distribution of the residuals on an interactive map.

tmap_mode("view")
tmap mode set to interactive viewing
tm_shape(mpsz_svy21)+
  tmap_options(check.and.fix = TRUE) +
  tm_polygons(alpha = 0.4) +
tm_shape(condo_resale.res.sf) +  
  tm_dots(col = "MLR_RES",
          alpha = 0.6,
          style="quantile") +
  tm_view(set.zoom.limits = c(11,14))
Warning: The shape mpsz_svy21 is invalid (after reprojection). See
sf::st_is_valid
Variable(s) "MLR_RES" contains positive and negative values, so midpoint is set to 0. Set midpoint = NA to show the full spectrum of the color palette.
tmap_mode("plot")
tmap mode set to plotting

The figure above reveal that there is sign of spatial autocorrelation.

To proof that our observation is indeed true, the Moran’s I test will be performed

First, we will compute the distance-based weight matrix by using dnearneigh() function of spdep.

nb <- dnearneigh(coordinates(condo_resale.sp), 0, 1500, longlat = FALSE)
Warning in dnearneigh(coordinates(condo_resale.sp), 0, 1500, longlat = FALSE):
neighbour object has 10 sub-graphs
summary(nb)
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 1436 
Number of nonzero links: 66266 
Percentage nonzero weights: 3.213526 
Average number of links: 46.14624 
10 disjoint connected subgraphs
Link number distribution:

  1   3   5   7   9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24 
  3   3   9   4   3  15  10  19  17  45  19   5  14  29  19   6  35  45  18  47 
 25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44 
 16  43  22  26  21  11   9  23  22  13  16  25  21  37  16  18   8  21   4  12 
 45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64 
  8  36  18  14  14  43  11  12   8  13  12  13   4   5   6  12  11  20  29  33 
 65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84 
 15  20  10  14  15  15  11  16  12  10   8  19  12  14   9   8   4  13  11   6 
 85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99 100 101 102 103 104 
  4   9   4   4   4   6   2  16   9   4   5   9   3   9   4   2   1   2   1   1 
105 106 107 108 109 110 112 116 125 
  1   5   9   2   1   3   1   1   1 
3 least connected regions:
193 194 277 with 1 link
1 most connected region:
285 with 125 links

Next, nb2listw() of spdep packge will be used to convert the output neighbours lists (i.e. nb) into a spatial weights.

nb_lw <- nb2listw(nb, style = 'W')
summary(nb_lw)
Characteristics of weights list object:
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 1436 
Number of nonzero links: 66266 
Percentage nonzero weights: 3.213526 
Average number of links: 46.14624 
10 disjoint connected subgraphs
Link number distribution:

  1   3   5   7   9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24 
  3   3   9   4   3  15  10  19  17  45  19   5  14  29  19   6  35  45  18  47 
 25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44 
 16  43  22  26  21  11   9  23  22  13  16  25  21  37  16  18   8  21   4  12 
 45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64 
  8  36  18  14  14  43  11  12   8  13  12  13   4   5   6  12  11  20  29  33 
 65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84 
 15  20  10  14  15  15  11  16  12  10   8  19  12  14   9   8   4  13  11   6 
 85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99 100 101 102 103 104 
  4   9   4   4   4   6   2  16   9   4   5   9   3   9   4   2   1   2   1   1 
105 106 107 108 109 110 112 116 125 
  1   5   9   2   1   3   1   1   1 
3 least connected regions:
193 194 277 with 1 link
1 most connected region:
285 with 125 links

Weights style: W 
Weights constants summary:
     n      nn   S0       S1       S2
W 1436 2062096 1436 94.81916 5798.341

Next, lm.morantest() of spdep package will be used to perform Moran’s I test for residual spatial autocorrelation

lm.morantest(condo.mlr1, nb_lw)

    Global Moran I for regression residuals

data:  
model: lm(formula = SELLING_PRICE ~ AREA_SQM + AGE + PROX_CBD +
PROX_CHILDCARE + PROX_ELDERLYCARE + PROX_URA_GROWTH_AREA + PROX_MRT +
PROX_PARK + PROX_PRIMARY_SCH + PROX_SHOPPING_MALL + PROX_BUS_STOP +
NO_Of_UNITS + FAMILY_FRIENDLY + FREEHOLD, data = condo_resale.sf)
weights: nb_lw

Moran I statistic standard deviate = 24.366, p-value < 2.2e-16
alternative hypothesis: greater
sample estimates:
Observed Moran I      Expectation         Variance 
    1.438876e-01    -5.487594e-03     3.758259e-05

The Global Moran’s I test for residual spatial autocorrelation shows that it’s p-value is less than 0.00000000000000022 which is less than the alpha value of 0.05. Hence, we will reject the null hypothesis that the residuals are randomly distributed.

Since the Observed Global Moran I = 0.1424418 which is greater than 0, we can infer than the residuals resemble cluster distribution.